My partner and I worked together to design and assemble my desk from T-slot aluminum extrusions. T-slot is amazing. It’s like Erector Set for adults, but nonproprietary and with more options. This allowed me to experiment and iterate and tweak things until the desk fit me perfectly. Aluminum extrusions make it super easy to mount virtually everything, from monitors to keyboards to cup holders. The shelves are finished plywood.
从接近蜜雪人士处获悉，蜜雪冰城全国首家“雪王室内乐园”项目位于河南郑州集团总部，目前各项工作正稳步推进中。据介绍，乐园以雪王IP为核心，打造充满甜蜜与奇幻的雪王世界。规划多个室内主题体验区，深度融合蜜雪冰城全球总部、全球旗舰店与主题乐园三大场景，打造“游玩+购物+体验”三位一体的体验体系。（大河财立方）
，更多细节参见服务器推荐
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
if (pending.length 0) yield [pending];
https://feedx.site